Trial reportPloS one2018
The effects of denosumab and alendronate on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with glomerular disease: A randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Denosumab and Alendronate in Improving Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Patients and High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Superiority of denosumab over bisphosphonates in preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE quality assessment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Denosumab, teriparatide and bisphosphonates for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of denosumab, teriparatide, and oral bisphosphonates in the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of denosumab and oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Denosumab in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy of denosumab on bisphosphonate-treated osteoporosis and osteopenia in systemic rheumatic disease patients receiving glucocorticoids.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2023Trial
- Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Denosumab Versus Bisphosphonates in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Denosumab in the Management of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Long-Term Efficacy and Secondary Fracture Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates on Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis in Patients with Neuroimmunological Disorders.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Monoclonal antibodies in patients with osteoporosis and renal insufficiency: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2024Review
- Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy.Spine deformity · 2023Review
- Effect of Bisphosphonate and Active Vitamin D Analog on Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis in Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Retrospective Observational Study.The Kobe journal of medical sciences · 2023Observational
- Antiresorptive treatments for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.British medical bulletin · 2022Article
- [Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis-Focus treatment (part 2)].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022Article
- German Society of Rheumatology recommendations for management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Review
- [German Society of Rheumatology Recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis. German version].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Review
- Therapies for Preventing Bone Loss with Glucocorticoid Treatment.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe clinical utility of denosumab for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers to those of alendronate in patients with GIOP.
methodsA prospective, single-center study of 32 patients (18 men; median age, 66.0 years) with glomerular disease receiving prednisolone (PSL) who were diagnosed as having GIOP and had not received bisphosphonates before was conducted. Participants were randomized to either alendronate (35 mg orally once a week) or denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously once every 6 months), and all subjects received calcitriol. The primary endpoint was the percent change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 12 months of treatment.
resultsThe demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline were not significantly different between the groups. Denosumab treatment markedly decreased serum levels of t-PINP, BAP, and TRACP-5b at 12 months compared to baseline (-57.4%, p<0.001; -30.9%, p<0.01; -57.7%, p<0.001, respectively). After 12 months of alendronate treatment, serum levels of t-PINP, BAP, and TRACP-5b were also significantly decreased compared to pretreatment (-38.9%, p<0.01; -16.3%, p<0.05; -43.5%, p<0.01, respectively). However, no significant differences in the changes of bone turnover markers were found between the two groups. As for the effects on BMD, denosumab treatment markedly increased LS BMD from 6 months compared to baseline, whereas no significant difference compared to pretreatment was found in the alendronate group during the study period. In the comparison of the two groups, a large increase of LS BMD was found in the denosumab treatment group compared to the alendronate treatment group at 12 months (p<0.05).
conclusionsIn patients with GIOP, denosumab treatment markedly suppressed bone turnover, which led to a significantly greater increase in LS BMD than with alendronate treatment. These results suggest that denosumab is a therapeutic option for the treatment of GIOP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.