Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29543830›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Dynamic minimum set problem for reserve design: Heuristic solutions for large problems.

Mathieu Bonneau, Régis Sabbadin, Fred A Johnson, Bradley Stith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathieu BonneauDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, P.O Box 110430, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-0430, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7004-8267
Régis SabbadinApplied Mathematics and Computer Science Unit, INRA-UR875, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville, CS 5267, 31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France.
Fred A JohnsonWetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 7920 NW 71 Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, United States of America.
Bradley StithWetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 7920 NW 71 Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversion of wild habitats to human dominated landscape is a major cause of biodiversity loss. An approach to mitigate the impact of habitat loss consists of designating reserves where habitat is preserved and managed. Determining the most valuable areas to preserve in a landscape is called the reserve design problem. There exists several possible formulations of the reserve design problem, depending on the objectives and the constraints. In this article, we considered the dynamic problem of designing a reserve that contains a desired area of several key habitats. The dynamic case implies that the reserve cannot be designed in one time step, due to budget constraints, and that habitats can be lost before they are reserved, due for example to climate change or human development. We proposed two heuristics strategies that can be used to select sites to reserve each year for large reserve design problem. The first heuristic is a combination of the Marxan and site-ordering algorithms and the second heuristic is an augmented version of the common naive myopic heuristic. We evaluated the strategies on several simulated examples and showed that the augmented greedy heuristic is particularly interesting when some of the habitats to protect are particularly threatened and/or the compactness of the network is accounted for.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClimate ChangeHeuristicsHuman DevelopmentModels, BiologicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID29543830
PMCPMC5854297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.