ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
A FAIR guide for data providers to maximise sharing of human genomic data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying the most important facilitators of open research data sharing and reuse in Epidemiology: A mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- An updated catalog ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- SquiDBase: a community resource of raw nanopore data from microbes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Lessons learned: Recommendations for reproducible paleogenomic data analyses.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Landscape analysis of available European data sources amenable for machine learning and recommendations on usability for rare diseases screening.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Open Data governance at the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform (CONP): From the Walled Garden to the Arboretum.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Equity, diversity, and inclusion at the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health.Cell genomics · 2023Review
- Open-source curation of a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma gene expression analysis platform (pdacR) supports a two-subtype model.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Selection of data sets for FAIRification in drug discovery and development: Which, why, and how?Drug discovery today · 2022Review
- FAIR Genomes metadata schema promoting Next Generation Sequencing data reuse in Dutch healthcare and research.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Tackling the translational challenges of multi-omics research in the realm of European personalised medicine: A workshop report.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- The importance of adherence to international standards for depositing open data in public repositories.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Orchestrating and sharing large multimodal data for transparent and reproducible research.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Review
- Digitalization, clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020Article
- Accurate Adapter Information Is Crucial for Reproducibility and Reusability in Small RNA Seq Studies.Non-coding RNA · 2019Article
- Long-term preservation of biomedical research data.F1000Research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is generally acknowledged that, for reproducibility and progress of human genomic research, data sharing is critical. For every sharing transaction, a successful data exchange is produced between a data consumer and a data provider. Providers of human genomic data (e.g., publicly or privately funded repositories and data archives) fulfil their social contract with data donors when their shareable data conforms to FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles. Based on our experiences via Repositive (https://repositive.io), a leading discovery platform cataloguing all shared human genomic datasets, we propose guidelines for data providers wishing to maximise their shared data's FAIRness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.