Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29543316›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018

Oral vitamin B

Haiyan Wang, Linyi Li, Ling Ling Qin, Yanan Song, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Tong Hua Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vitamin BNutrients · 2026
    Review
  8. Vitamin BThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haiyan WangInstitute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, North Third Ring Road, School range, ChaoYang District, Beijing, Beijing, China, 100029.
Linyi Li
Ling Ling Qin
Yanan Song
Josep Vidal-Alaball
Tong Hua Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin B

objectivesTo assess the effects of oral vitamin B SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS, as well as the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. The latest search date was 17 July 2017. We applied no language restrictions. We also contacted authors of relevant trials to enquire about other published or unpublished studies and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of oral versus IM vitamin B DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were serum vitamin B MAIN

resultsThree RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The trials randomised 153 participants (74 participants to oral vitamin B AUTHORS'

conclusionsLow quality evidence shows oral and IM vitamin B

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedHumansInjections, IntramuscularRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin B 12Vitamin B 12 DeficiencyVitamin B ComplexVitamin B 12Vitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID29543316
PMCPMC6494183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.