ArticleSaudi medical journal2018
Hysteroscopy as an investigation tool in recurrent implantation failure in vitro fertilization.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of therapies and interventions for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Recurrent implantation failure: a registry-corroborated, age-stratified definition and pragmatic five-tiered management algorithm.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Comparison and correlations between findings of hysteroscopy and vaginal color Doppler ultrasonography for detection of uterine abnormalities in patients with recurrent implantation failure.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Hysteroscopic Identification of Intrauterine Pathology in Oocyte Donation Cycles: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology.Fertility and sterility · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the use of hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine pathologies in infertile women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and determine whether removal of such pathologies increased pregnancy rates in women with RIF.
methodsThis prospective study was conducted at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, between January 2010 and December 2015. The inclusion criteria were women who underwent IVF treatment cycles and ended in more than 2 RIF, and women who underwent hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysteroscopies were performed, findings were recorded, and the clinical pregnancy rates were compared and assessed in patients with and without uterine cavity abnormality. All hysteroscopic procedures were performed by a single consultant.
resultsHysteroscopies were performed on 266 women who had at least 2 RIF. The average duration of infertility was 7.2±3.1 years. In 162 patients (60.9%), a hysteroscopy did not find any abnormality of the uterine cavity. In 104 patients (39.1%) there were one or more abnormal hysteroscopic findings. Hysterosalpingography was able to detect only 54 abnormalities (51.9%). The pregnancy rate was significantly higher in patients who were treated by a hysteroscopy for a detected uterine abnormality (39.4%).
conclusionA hysteroscopy was able to detect intrauterine pathologies which were missed by other investigative modalities. We believe patients with a history of RIF should undergo hysteroscopic examination before any further cycles are considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.