ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2018
The changing practice of transurethral resection of the prostate.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of supramontanal preservation in ejaculation-sparing after transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Central European journal of urology · 2026Review
- The 21st century marks a rise in TURP retreatment rates: an analysis of Veterans Health Administration data.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Tackling the progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia/benign prostatic obstruction progression: Deobstructing within the "window of curability" (a hypothesis-generating review).Current urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- A flexible cystoscopy device prototype for mechanical tissue ablation based on micro-scale hydrodynamic cavitation: Ex vivo and in vivo studies.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
- Development of a clinical decision support tool for Primary care Management of lower Urinary tract Symptoms in men: the PriMUS study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Article
- Shifts in clinical practice and patient demographics following the introduction of holmium laser enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia in a general urology clinic.Journal of biological methods · 2025Article
- Voiding efficiency: a predictor of failed trial off catheter after transurethral resection of prostate.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative assessment of attitudes and expectations: Iranian patients versus urologists in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Application of root cause analysis and TEAMSTEPPS post intravesical gas explosion during transurethral resection of the prostate: a rare case report.BMC urology · 2024Article
- The prostatic middle lobe: clinical significance, presentation and management.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Laser and Electrosurgical Transurethral Procedures for the Treatment of BPO in High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review.Research and reports in urology · 2022Review
- Analysis of Risk Factors and Nursing Strategies for Postoperative Hemorrhage of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- The state of TURP through a historical lens.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2021Article
- The Design and Rationale of a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Transperineal Percutaneous Laser Ablation With Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Research on Applications of Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in Elderly Patients Aged ≥80 Years.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The number of TURPs performed has declined significantly over the last three decades owing to pharmaceutical therapy. TURP data from a single institution for the years 1990, 2000 and 2010 were compared to assess the difference in performance. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all patients who underwent TURP between January and December 2010. These findings were compared with historical data for the years 1990 and 2000: 100 sets of case notes were selected randomly from each of these years. Results The number of TURPs performed fell from 326 in 1990 to 113 in 2010. The mean age of patients increased from 70.6 years to 74.0 years. There was also a significant increase in the mean ASA grade from 1.9 to 2.3. The most common indication for TURP shifted from LUTS to acute urinary retention. No significant change in operating time was observed. The mean resection weight remained constant (22.95g in 1990, 22.55g in 2000, 20.76g in 2010). A reduction in transfusion rates was observed but there were higher rates of secondary haematuria and bladder neck stenosis. There was an increase from 2% to 11.5% of patients with long-term failure to void following TURP. Conclusions The number of TURPs performed continues to decline, which could lead to potential training issues. Urinary retention is still by far the most common indication. However, there has been a significant rise in the percentage of men presenting for TURP with high pressure chronic retention. The number of patients with bladder dysfunction who either have persistent storage LUTS or eventually require long-term catheterisation or intermittent self-catheterisation has increased markedly, which raises the question of what the long-term real life impact of medical therapy is on men with LUTS secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia who eventually require surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.