Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29542369›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2019

Detection of feline coronavirus mutations in paraffin-embedded tissues in cats with feline infectious peritonitis and controls.

Laura Sangl, Kaspar Matiasek, Sandra Felten, Stefanie Gründl, Michele Bergmann, Hans-Jörg Balzer, Nikola Pantchev, Christian M Leutenegger, Katrin Hartmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Sangl1 Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Kaspar Matiasek2 Section of Clinical and Comparative Neuropathology, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Sandra Felten1 Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie Gründl1 Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Michele Bergmann1 Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Hans-Jörg Balzer3 IDEXX Laboratories, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Nikola Pantchev3 IDEXX Laboratories, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Christian M Leutenegger4 IDEXX Laboratories, West Sacramento, CA, USA.
Katrin Hartmann1 Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEIDEXX Laboratories (Germany) · DEIDEXX Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe amino acid substitutions M1058L and S1060A in the spike protein of feline coronavirus (FCoV) have been postulated to be responsible for the development of the pathogenic feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV), which causes feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). The aim of the following study was to investigate the presence of mutated virus in tissue samples of cats with and without FIP.

methodsThe study population consisted of 64 cats, 34 of which were diagnosed with FIP and 30 control cats. All cases underwent autopsy, histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for FCoV. Furthermore, a genotype-discriminating quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed on shavings of paraffin-embedded tissues to discriminate between cats with FIP and controls, and the sensitivity and specificity of this discriminating RT-qPCR were calculated using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsSpecificity of genotype-discriminating RT-qPCR was 100.0% (95% CI 88.4-100.0), and sensitivity was 70.6% (95% CI 52.5-84.9). In cats with FIP, 24/34 tested positive for FIPV. In samples of three control cats and in seven cats with FIP, FCoV was found, but genotyping was not possible owing to low FCoV RNA concentrations. Out of the positive samples, 23 showed the amino acid substitution M1058L in the spike protein and none the substitution S1060A. One sample in a cat with FIP revealed a mixed population of non-mutated FCoV and FIPV (mixed genotype). For one sample genotyping was not possible despite high viral load, and two samples were negative for FCoV. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: As none of the control animals showed FCoV amino acid substitutions previously demonstrated in cats with FIP, it can be presumed that the substitution M1058L correlates with the presence of FIP. FCoV was detected in low concentration in tissues of control animals, confirming the ability of FCoV to spread systemically. The fact that no negative controls were included in the IHC protocol could potentially lead to an underestimation of the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsFeline Infectious PeritonitisAnimalsCatsCoronavirus, FelineMutationParaffin EmbeddingPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID29542369
PMCPMC10814605
OpenAlexW2793558906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.