Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29542188›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2018

Correlates of accelerometer-assessed physical activity in pregnancy-The 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study.

S G da Silva, K R Evenson, I C M da Silva, M A Mendes, M R Domingues, M F da Silveira, F C Wehrmeister, U Ekelund, P C Hallal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

S G da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-6936
K R EvensonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
I C M da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
M A MendesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
M R DominguesPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
M F da SilveiraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
F C WehrmeisterPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
U EkelundDepartment of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
P C HallalPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NO

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective methods to measure physical activity (PA) have become available and widely used given the high degree of precision to evaluate PA. However, few studies have used accelerometers to measure PA during pregnancy, especially in low- and middle-income countries. We assessed overall PA, moderate, vigorous, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) objectively measured among pregnant women and their correlates in a population-based study. PA was assessed for seven consecutive days using a raw triaxial wrist-worn accelerometer in women interviewed around 16 and 24 weeks of gestation in the 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study. The average acceleration, which expresses overall PA, was presented in milli-g (1 mg = 0.001 g), and average time (min/day) spent in MVPA (>100 mg) was also analyzed in 5- and 10-min bouts. Analyses were performed using linear regression. In total, 2317 women were included in the analyses. Overall PA was 27.6 mg. Pregnant women spent on average 14 min/day in MVPA and 0.4 min in vigorous PA. Time spent in MVPA and total PA were inversely associated with years in school and income, and were lower among women receiving advice to not exercise. MVPA was also inversely associated with age, lower among women living with a partner, and higher among non-white women. The study indicated low levels of PA among pregnant women. The identified correlates may provide a framework to better understand factors influencing PA during pregnancy and thus inform future interventions.

Indexed as

ExercisePregnancyAccelerometryAdultBrazilCohort StudiesFemaleHumansSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultaccelerometryantenatal carecohort studiesmaternal-child healthphysical activitypregnancypregnant women

Identifiers

PMID29542188
PMCPMC6055654
OpenAlexW2790728473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.