ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Malignancy probability map as a novel imaging biomarker to predict malignancy distribution: employing MRS in GBM patients.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to propose a new statistical method for evaluation of spatial malignancy distribution within Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) grid in Glioblastoma Multiforme patients. Voxels with different malignancy probabilities were presented as a novel MRS-based Malignancy Probability Map (MPM). For this purpose, a predictive probability-based clustering approach was developed, including the two following steps: (1) Gaussian Mixture Model, (2) Quadratic Discriminate Analysis coupled with Genetic Algorithm. Clustered probability values from two methods were then integrated to exploit the MPM. Results show that the suggested method is able to estimate the malignancy distribution with over 90% sensitivity and specificity. The proposed MRS-based MPM has an acceptable accuracy for providing useful complementary information about regional diffuse glioma malignancy, with the potential to lead to better detection of tumoral regions with high probability of malignancy. So, it also may encourage the use of additional information of this map as a tool for dose painting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29542059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.