Correction to: The development of a healing model of care for an Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation service: a community-based participatory research approach.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Peer support for social care in prison: development of guidance and a logic model informed by mixed studies review and co-development workshops.Health & justice · 2026
   Article
2. Understanding the client characteristics of Aboriginal residential alcohol and other drug rehabilitation services in New South Wales, Australia.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  The development of a healing model of care for an Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation service: a community-based participatory research approach.2017

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract