Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29541843›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2018

FISH-aimed karyotype analysis in Aconitum subgen. Aconitum reveals excessive rDNA sites in tetraploid taxa.

Andrzej J Joachimiak, Robert Hasterok, Elwira Sliwinska, Krystyna Musiał, Aleksandra Grabowska-Joachimiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-Omics on Traditional Medicinal Plant of the GenusMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrzej J JoachimiakDepartment of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, PL-30-387, Kraków, Poland. a.joachimiak@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6939-0938
Robert HasterokDepartment of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.
Elwira SliwinskaLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Cytometry, Department of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Kaliskiego 7, 85-789, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Krystyna MusiałDepartment of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, PL-30-387, Kraków, Poland.
Aleksandra Grabowska-JoachimiakDepartment of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Łobzowska 24, 31-140, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

State Commitee for Scientific Research 2 P04C 072 29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The location of 5S and 35S rDNA sequences in chromosomes of four Aconitum subsp. Aconitum species was analyzed after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Both in diploids (2n = 2x = 16; Aconitum variegatum, A. degenii) and tetraploids (2n = 4× = 32; A. firmum, A. plicatum), rDNA repeats were localized exclusively on the shorter arms of chromosomes, in subterminal or pericentromeric sites. All analyzed species showed similar basal genome size (Cx = 5.31-5.71 pg). The most striking features of tetraploid karyotypes were the conservation of diploid rDNA loci and emergence of many additional 5S rDNA clusters. Chromosomal distribution of excessive ribosomal sites suggests their role in the secondary diploidization of tetraploid karyotypes.

Indexed as

TetraploidyAconitumChromosomes, PlantDiploidyDNA, PlantDNA, RibosomalIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingPolyploidyDNA, PlantDNA, RibosomalAconitumChromosomesDiploidizationFISHNuclear DNA amountrDNA

Identifiers

PMID29541843
PMCPMC6133112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.