Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29541803›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2018

A Phase 1, open-label, multicentre study to compare the capsule and tablet formulations of AZD5363 and explore the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic exposure, safety and tolerability of AZD5363 in patients with advanced solid malignancies: OAK.

Emma Dean, Udai Banerji, Jan H M Schellens, Matthew G Krebs, Begona Jimenez, Emilie van Brummelen, Chris Bailey, Ed Casson, Diana Cripps, Marie Cullberg and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "The emerging role of capivasertib in breast cancer".Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Targeting Akt in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Tumor Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Capivasertib, an AKT Kinase Inhibitor, as Monotherapy or in Combination with Fulvestrant in Patients withClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Emma DeanThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. emma.dean@astrazeneca.com.
Udai BanerjiRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Jan H M SchellensNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthew G KrebsThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Begona JimenezRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Emilie van BrummelenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris BaileyIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Ed CassonIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Diana CrippsIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Marie CullbergIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen EvansAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Andrew FoxleyIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Justin LindemannIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Paul RugmanIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Nigel TaylorAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Guy TurnerAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
James YatesIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Peter LawrenceIMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11566Cancer Research UK 22897Cancer Research UK C12540/A15573Cancer Research UK C1467/A15578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAZD5363 is a potent pan-AKT inhibitor originally formulated as a capsule; a tablet was developed for patient convenience and manufacturing ease. This study assessed the PK comparability of both formulations (Part A) and the effect of food (Part B) on the PK/safety of the tablet.

methodsAdults with advanced solid tumours received AZD5363 480 mg bid in a partially fasted state by tablet (Week 1) and capsule (Week 2) in a '4-days-on/3-days-off' schedule (Part A). PK parameters were evaluated using pre-defined 90% CIs for AUCτ and C

resultsIn evaluable patients (N = 11), the geometric least-squares mean ratios (tablet:capsule) for AUCτ and C

conclusionsPK and safety/tolerability of AZD5363 tablet and capsule were comparable. Food did not affect the bioavailability of AZD5363, but reduced the absorption rate without discernibly affecting safety/tolerability.

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiological AvailabilityCapsulesCross-Over StudiesFastingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPyrimidinesPyrrolesTabletsAntineoplastic AgentscapivasertibCapsulesPyrimidinesPyrrolesTabletsAdvanced solid tumourAKT inhibitorAZD5363CapsuleFed:fastedTablet

Identifiers

PMID29541803
PMCPMC5907623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.