ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018
Effects of bone remodeling agents following teriparatide treatment.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential treatment strategies for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Pooled it
- Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient.North American Spine Society journal · 2024Review
- Can Over Six Months of Teriparatide Treatment Prevent the Progression of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture?Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 on the Optimal Management of Osteoporosis.Journal of bone metabolism · 2021Article
- Does Teriparatide Improve Fracture Union?: A Systematic Review.Journal of bone metabolism · 2020Article
- Predicting osteoporosis medication receipt in Veterans with a spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teriparatide is an anabolic therapy used to treat patients with osteoporosis and is only approved for 2 years of treatment. This is the first study to look at two common osteoporosis drugs in maintaining its beneficial effects: denosumab and zoledronic acid. Denosumab treatment was associated with the greatest increase in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine, an amount that was statistically greater than no treatment and zoledronic acid treatment.
introductionTeriparatide, a hallmark treatment for osteoporosis, has been shown to increase BMD and bone turnover. This can be measured using BMD scans, N-terminal propeptide of type-1 collagen (P1NP) for bone formation and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) for bone resorption. This study examines the effects of the two most common antiresorptive drugs prescribed following 2 years of teriparatide treatment: zoledronic acid and denosumab. The purpose of this study is to quantify the beneficial effects of teriparatide and compare the ability of each antiresorptive drug to maintain the effects.
methodsNinety-four patients with prior fragility fractures were identified from a bone health clinic associated with a level I trauma center. All of the study participants completed 2 years of treatment with teriparatide between 2008 and 2013 followed by 2 years of treatment with zoledronic acid, denosumab, or no treatment. After excluding patients with insufficient laboratory data, 64 patients remained for analysis in this retrospective cohort study. Bone mineral density was measured in the lumbar spine and femoral neck.
resultsFollowing completion of teriparatide, patients who were started on denosumab showed the largest increase in bone mineral density after 2 years of treatment: lumbar spine 4.94% ± 8.2%, femoral neck 5.68% ± 6.7%.
conclusionsPatients who elected to discontinue osteoporosis treatment experienced a significant decline in the change in BMD compared to the change on teriparatide putting them at higher risk for recurrence of fragility fractures. Patients on denosumab following teriparatide had the largest increase in BMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.