Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29541629›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2018

Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Potential Role of Microbial Dysbiosis and Recommendations for Sampling Sites.

Elizabeth Copeland, Katherine Leonard, Richard Carney, Justin Kong, Martin Forer, Yuresh Naidoo, Brian G G Oliver, Justin R Seymour, Stephen Woodcock, Catherine M Burke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of Antibiotic Exposure on Upper Respiratory Tract Bacterial Flora.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [The role ofLin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational and in vitro evaluation of probiotic treatments for nasalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Human beta defensin-2 protects the epithelial barrier during methicillin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth CopelandThe School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Katherine LeonardSydney Centre for Ear Nose and Throat, Frenchs Forest, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard CarneyThe Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Justin KongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Martin ForerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yuresh NaidooDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brian G G OliverThe School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Justin R SeymourThe Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephen WoodcockThe Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Catherine M BurkeThe School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas W StowDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AUWoolcock Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition that affects up to 12% of the human population in developed countries. Previous studies examining the potential role of the sinus bacterial microbiota within CRS infections have found inconsistent results, possibly because of inconsistencies in sampling strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether the sinus microbiome is altered in CRS and additionally if the middle meatus is a suitable representative site for sampling the sinus microbiome. Swab samples were collected from 12 healthy controls and 21 CRS patients, including all eight sinuses for CRS patients and between one and five sinuses for control subjects. The left and right middle meatus and nostril swabs were also collected. Significant differences in the sinus microbiomes between CRS and control samples were revealed using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The genus

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseBacteriaBiodiversityCarnobacteriaceaeDNA, BacterialDysbiosisEscherichiaHumansMicrobiotaNasal CavityParanasal SinusesRhinitisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence AnalysisSinusitisDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingchronic rhinosinusitismicrobiomemiddle meatussinus

Identifiers

PMID29541629
PMCPMC5836553
OpenAlexW2789156667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.