Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29541625›Full record

ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2018

Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Carmelo Messina, Gabriele Maffi, Jacopo Antonino Vitale, Fabio Massimo Ulivieri, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical Features and Prevalence of Osteosarcopenia in Chronic Pancreatitis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Myosteatosis: diagnostic significance and assessment by imaging approaches.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carmelo MessinaUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele MaffiScuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Jacopo Antonino VitaleIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Fabio Massimo UlivieriBone Metabolic Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Medicina Nucleare, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe GuglielmiRadiology Department, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Luca Maria SconfienzaScuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis and sarcopenia represent two major health problems with an increasing prevalence in the elderly population. The correlation between these diseases has been widely reported, leading to the development of the term "osteosarcopenia" to diagnose those patients suffering from both diseases. Several imaging methods for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis exist, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) being the most commonly used for measuring bone mineral density (BMD). Imaging technique other than DXA is represented by conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US). Similarly, the imaging technologies used to detect loss of skeletal muscle mass in sarcopenia include DXA, CT, US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These methods differ in terms of reliability, radiation exposure and costs. CT and MRI represent the gold standard for evaluating body composition (BC), but are costly and time-consuming. DXA remains the most often used technology for studying BC, being quick, widely available and with low radiation exposure.

Indexed as

dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)imagingOsteoporosissarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID29541625
PMCPMC5835659
OpenAlexW2783059016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.