Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29541575›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Comparing fMRI activation during smooth pursuit eye movements among contact sport athletes, non-contact sport athletes, and non-athletes.

Derek Kellar, Sharlene Newman, Franco Pestilli, Hu Cheng, Nicholas L Port

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Derek KellarDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, United States.
Sharlene NewmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, United States.
Franco PestilliDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, United States.
Hu ChengDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, United States.
Nicholas L PortDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, United States. Electronic address: nport@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Eye movement dynamics: a rapid objective involuntary measure of concussion/mTBIR21DC013974 · NIDCD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PORT, NICHOLAS LINDMAN · 2014 to 2015
$429k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC013974NIH HHS ULTTR001108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Though sub-concussive impacts are common during contact sports, there is little consensus whether repeat blows affect brain function. Using a "lifetime exposure" rather than acute exposure approach, we examined oculomotor performance and brain activation among collegiate football players and two control groups. Our analysis examined whether there are group differences in eye movement behavioral performance and in brain activation during smooth pursuit. Methods: Data from 21 off-season Division I football "starters" were compared with a) 19 collegiate cross-country runners, and b) 11 non-athlete college students who were SES matched to the football player group (total Results: No meaningful differences were found for any of the standard analyses used to assess smooth pursuit eye movements. For fMRI, greater activation was seen in the oculomotor region of the cerebellar vermis and areas of the FEF for football players as compared to either control group, who did not differ on any measure. Conclusion: Greater cerebellar activity among football players while performing an oculomotor task could indicate that they are working harder to compensate for some subtle, long-term subconcussive deficits. Alternatively, top athletes in a sport requiring high visual motor skill could have more of their cerebellum and FEF devoted to oculomotor task performance regardless of subconcussive history. Overall, these results provide little firm support for an effect of accumulated subconcussion exposure on brain function.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnalysis of VarianceAthletesBrain ConcussionFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleOxygenPhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationPursuit, SmoothYoung AdultOxygenCollegiate athleticsfMRISmooth pursuit

Identifiers

PMID29541575
PMCPMC5849867
OpenAlexW2793674560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.