Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29541509›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Gel wax-based tissue-mimicking phantoms for multispectral photoacoustic imaging.

Efthymios Maneas, Wenfeng Xia, Olumide Ogunlade, Martina Fonseca, Daniil I Nikitichev, Anna L David, Simeon J West, Sebastien Ourselin, Jeremy C Hebden, Tom Vercauteren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review of imaging test phantoms.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Review
  12. Phantoms for Quantitative Ultrasound.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  13. A patient-specific multi-modality abdominal aortic aneurysm imaging phantom.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Efthymios ManeasWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.
Wenfeng XiaWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.
Olumide OgunladeDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Martina FonsecaDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Daniil I NikitichevWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.
Anna L DavidWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.
Simeon J WestDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, Main Theatres, Maple Bridge Link Corridor, Podium 3, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Sebastien OurselinWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.
Jeremy C HebdenDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Tom VercauterenWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.
Adrien E DesjardinsWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 310970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-mimicking phantoms are widely used for the calibration, evaluation and standardisation of medical imaging systems, and for clinical training. For photoacoustic imaging, tissue-mimicking materials (TMMs) that have tuneable optical and acoustic properties, high stability, and mechanical robustness are highly desired. In this study, gel wax is introduced as a TMM that satisfies these criteria for developing photoacoustic imaging phantoms. The reduced scattering and optical absorption coefficients were independently tuned with the addition of TiO

Indexed as

(110.3000) Image quality assessment(110.5120) Photoacoustic imaging(120.5820) Scattering measurements(160.4760) Optical properties(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.7170) Ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID29541509
PMCPMC5846519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.