ArticleScientific reports2018
Interconnected Microphysiological Systems for Quantitative Biology and Pharmacology Studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 242 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
242 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A quantitative meta-analysis comparing cell models in perfused organ on a chip with static cell cultures.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical trials in a dish: cardiometabolic drug development with biological and digital twins.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Engineering human multi-organ tissue chip niches for drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity prediction.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Microphysiological models of human gastrointestinal diseases.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Reverse bioengineering of the liver: developmental principles for next-generation liver-on-a-chip systems.Communications biology · 2026Review
- The Translational Paradox of Cancer Nanomedicine: Biological, Pharmacokinetic, and Manufacturing Barriers to Clinical Success.Biology · 2026Review
- PK-Informed Microphysiological Systems: From Dynamic Dosing to Quantitative In Vitro-In Vivo Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Making the Case for Organ-on-Chip Platforms in Long-Acting Therapeutics Development.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Emerging organoids and organoids-on-chip platforms for translational development of antibody‒drug conjugates and next-generation bioconjugates.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Reproductive Bioengineering: Integrating Fertility Diagnostics, Organ-on-Chip Systems, Cryobiology and Epigenetic Safety for Precision Reproductive Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging Regenerative Medicine for Spinal Cord Injury: Spinal Cord Organoids-on-a-Chip.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Synergistic innovation in organ-on-a-chip and organoid technologies: reshaping the future of disease modeling, drug development, and precision medicine.Protein & cell · 2026Review
- Engineering skin microphysiological systems for transdermal drug screening based on strategic model selection and quantitative prediction roadmaps.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Recent advances in sex-specific reproductive microphysiological systems for the systematic evaluation of assisted reproductive technology.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Inter-organ communication shapes human metabolic tissue states and resolves anti-diabetic drug response modes in a six-tissue microphysiological system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- In vitro modeling of renal injury-induced cardiac effects using human iPSC-derived organoids.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Tuneable Permeability of Cellulose Nanofibrils-based Membranes in Next-Generation Barrier-On-Chip Systems.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- STARTER: a stand-alone reconfigurable and translational organ-on-chip platform based on modularity and open design principles.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Organ-on-a-Chip Technology and Global Multi-Omics: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- ML-automated microfluidic circuit design.Science advances · 2026Article
182 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microphysiological systems (MPSs) are in vitro models that capture facets of in vivo organ function through use of specialized culture microenvironments, including 3D matrices and microperfusion. Here, we report an approach to co-culture multiple different MPSs linked together physiologically on re-useable, open-system microfluidic platforms that are compatible with the quantitative study of a range of compounds, including lipophilic drugs. We describe three different platform designs - "4-way", "7-way", and "10-way" - each accommodating a mixing chamber and up to 4, 7, or 10 MPSs. Platforms accommodate multiple different MPS flow configurations, each with internal re-circulation to enhance molecular exchange, and feature on-board pneumatically-driven pumps with independently programmable flow rates to provide precise control over both intra- and inter-MPS flow partitioning and drug distribution. We first developed a 4-MPS system, showing accurate prediction of secreted liver protein distribution and 2-week maintenance of phenotypic markers. We then developed 7-MPS and 10-MPS platforms, demonstrating reliable, robust operation and maintenance of MPS phenotypic function for 3 weeks (7-way) and 4 weeks (10-way) of continuous interaction, as well as PK analysis of diclofenac metabolism. This study illustrates several generalizable design and operational principles for implementing multi-MPS "physiome-on-a-chip" approaches in drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.