Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29540604›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2018

The Implementation and First-Round Results of a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Shanghai, China.

Yangming Gong, Peng Peng, Pingping Bao, Weijian Zhong, Yan Shi, Kai Gu, Ying Zheng, Chunxiao Wu, Sanjun Cai, Ye Xu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Geographical Disparities in Faecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation and Positivity Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yangming GongShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Peng PengShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Pingping BaoShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Weijian ZhongShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan ShiShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kai GuShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhengShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunxiao WuShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sanjun CaiShanghai Tumor Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ye XuShanghai Tumor Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jun ShengShanghai Tumor Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Fan WuShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China wufan@smhb.gov.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence and mortality rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased dramatically over the past 3 decades in China due to changes in lifestyle factors. Early detection and treatment guidelines for asymptomatic cases have shown to improve CRC control in developed countries. In response to these challenges, the Shanghai Municipal Government launched a community-based CRC screening program in 2012. MATERIALS AND

methodsFree initial screening, inclusive of immunochemical fecal occult blood and risk assessment (questionnaire), was provided by community health centers in Shanghai. Participants with positive results were referred to a specialist for a colonoscopy.

resultsIn 2013, 828,302 Shanghai residents were registered; 97.7% (809,528) of the registrants completed initial screening. Among 180,094 initial screening-positive participants, 71,733 underwent colonoscopy. The proportion of compliance to colonoscopy was 39.8%; the proportion decreased with age and educational level. A total of 6,668 adenomas were detected, and 1,630 CRC cases were diagnosed. The CRC detection rate of the program was 201.35/100,000; among the detected CRCs, 51.6% were in stage 0-I.

conclusionThe screening program achieved great progress, especially on initial screening completion and CRC early stage rate, although particular intervention is still needed to improve the compliance of colonoscopy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Due to socioeconomic transitions and lifestyle changes, colorectal cancer is now becoming one of the most common cancers in developing countries, as it is in developed countries. While most developed countries have now initiated national colorectal cancer screening programs based on recommended country-specific colorectal cancer screening guidelines, colonoscopy has become the most commonly used screening method. This is a challenge in developing countries due to limited resources. Based on the analysis of the Shanghai colorectal cancer screening program, with immunological fecal occult blood test and risk assessment as initial screening, followed by a diagnostic testing of colonoscopy for individuals with positive results, this article provides the basis and suggestion for similar program in other regions of China and other developing countries.

Indexed as

AgedChinaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer screeningColorectal cancerPublic health

Identifiers

PMID29540604
PMCPMC6156172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.