Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29540463›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2019

Development of a gastroschisis core outcome set.

Benjamin Saul Raywood Allin, Nigel J Hall, Andrew R Ross, Sean S Marven, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Marian Knight, NETS1G collaboration

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Moving toward the Development and Effective Implementation of High-Quality Guidelines in Pediatric Surgery: A Review of the Literature.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin Saul Raywood AllinNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-2733
Nigel J HallSouthampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374
Andrew R RossOxford Children's Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Sean S MarvenSheffield Children's Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Jennifer J KurinczukNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-4575
NETS1G collaboration

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2015-08-076Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOutcome reporting heterogeneity impedes identification of gold standard treatments for children born with gastroschisis. Use of core outcome sets (COSs) in research reduces outcome reporting heterogeneity and ensures that studies are relevant to patients. The aim of this study was to develop a gastroschisis COS. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic reviews and stakeholder nomination were used to identify candidate outcomes that were subsequently prioritised by key stakeholders in a three-phase online Delphi process and face-to-face consensus meeting using a 9-point Likert scale. In phases two and three of the Delphi process, participants were shown graphical and numerical representations of their own, and all panels scores for each outcome respectively and asked to review their previous score in light of this information. Outcomes were carried forward to the consensus meeting if prioritised by two or three stakeholder panels in the third phase of the Delphi process. The COS was formed from outcomes where ≥70% of consensus meeting participants scored the outcome 7-9 and <15% of participants scored it 1-3.

results71 participants (84%) completed all phases of the Delphi process, during which 87 outcomes were assessed. Eight outcomes, mortality, sepsis, growth, number of operations, severe gastrointestinal complication, time on parenteral nutrition, liver disease and quality of life for the child, met criteria for inclusion in the COS.

conclusionsEight outcomes have been included in the gastroschisis COS as a result of their importance to key stakeholders. Implementing use of the COS will increase the potential for identification of gold standard treatments for the management of children born with gastroschisis.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeDelphi TechniqueGastrointestinal DiseasesGastroschisisHumansLiver DiseasesOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareParenteral NutritionResearch DesignSepsisSurgical Procedures, Operativecore outcome setsepidemiologygastroschisispaediatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID29540463
PMCPMC6762000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.