Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29540411›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Psychological interventions for positive symptoms in schizophrenia: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Irene Bighelli, Georgia Salanti, Cornelia Reitmeir, Sofia Wallis, Corrado Barbui, Toshi A Furukawa, Stefan Leucht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. The controversy about cognitive behavioural therapy for schizophrenia.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2019
    Article
  7. Psychological interventions to reduce positive symptoms in schizophrenia: systematic review and network meta-analysis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irene BighelliDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technischen Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5661-5149
Georgia SalantiInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cornelia ReitmeirDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technischen Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany.
Sofia WallisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technischen Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany.
Corrado BarbuiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-3776
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technischen Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is rising awareness that we need multidisciplinary approaches integrating psychological treatments for schizophrenia, but a comprehensive evidence based on their relative efficacy is lacking. We will conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA), integrating direct and indirect comparisons from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to rank psychological treatments for schizophrenia according to their efficacy, acceptability and tolerability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include all RCTs comparing a psychological treatment aimed at positive symptoms of schizophrenia with another psychological intervention or with a no treatment condition (waiting-list and treatment as usual). We will include studies on adult patients with schizophrenia, excluding specific subpopulations (eg, first-episode patients or patients with psychiatric comorbidities). Primary outcome will be the change in positive symptoms on a published rating scale. Secondary outcomes will be acceptability (dropout), change in overall and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, response, relapse, adherence, depression, quality of life, functioning and adverse events. Published and unpublished studies will be sought through database searches, trial registries and websites. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. We will conduct random-effects NMA to synthesise all evidences for each outcome and obtain a comprehensive ranking of all treatments. NMA will be conducted in Stata and R within a frequentist framework. The risk of bias in studies will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the credibility of the evidence will be evaluated using an adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to NMA, recommended by the Cochrane guidance. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. Results from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017067795.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCounselingHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychotherapy, GroupPsychotic DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchizophreniaadult psychiatrynetwork meta-analysispsychological interventionspsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29540411
PMCPMC5857696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.