Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29540171›Full record

Observational studyBMC gastroenterology2018

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: results of a retrospective study and a geriatricians' point of view.

Marianna Galeazzi, Paolo Mazzola, Breanna Valcarcel, Giuseppe Bellelli, Marco Dinelli, Giulio Maria Pasinetti, Giorgio Annoni

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Tumors in Older Patients: Balancing Oncologic Benefit and Geriatric Risk.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography of geriatric patients with cholangitis: A single-center experience in central Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography a reliable procedure in advanced age? A single tertiary center experience.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Opium addiction is associated with increased risk of ERCP-related complications: A matched case-control study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Surgical management of Stapfer Type 2 ERCP perforations.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marianna GaleazziUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, U8 Building, Floor 4, Lab 4045, Via Cadore, 48 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Paolo MazzolaUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, U8 Building, Floor 4, Lab 4045, Via Cadore, 48 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy. paolo.mazzola@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-1136
Breanna ValcarcelIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Giuseppe BellelliUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, U8 Building, Floor 4, Lab 4045, Via Cadore, 48 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Marco DinelliSan Gerardo Hospital ASST Monza, Endoscopy Unit, Monza, MB, Italy.
Giulio Maria PasinettiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Giorgio AnnoniUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, U8 Building, Floor 4, Lab 4045, Via Cadore, 48 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of biliary tract pathology is growing with an age-related trend, and progresses as the population ages. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents the gold standard for treatment in these cases, but evidence about its safety in the elderly is still debated.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of all patients aged ≥65 undergoing ERCP between July 2013 and July 2015. Of 387 ERCP cases, 363 (~ 94%) were completed entirely. The mean age of the study population (n = 363) was 79.9 years old (range 70-95), with 190 subjects aged 70-79 and 173 older than 80. We recorded demographics, Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification score, indication for the use of the ERCP procedure, and clinical outcomes. Then, we tested all variables to identify the potential risk factors for complications associated with the procedure.

resultsThe older group (those ≥80 years old) showed significantly more patients with ASA Classes III-IV than the younger one (those ≤79 years old). Interestingly, the CCI was higher in the younger group (p = 0.009). The overall complication rate was 17.3% without inter-group differences. Older age, sex, CCI and intra-ERCP procedures were not related to a higher risk of complications, and the multivariate regression did not identify any of the considered variables to be an independent risk factor for complications.

conclusionERCP appears as safe in the patients aged 80 years and older, as it is in those aged 70-79 years old in our study, however, a selection bias may affect these findings. A study including a comprehensive geriatric assessment will contribute to shedding light on this issue.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiliary Tract DiseasesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesElderlyEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEndoscopyERCPProcedural complications

Identifiers

PMID29540171
PMCPMC5853060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.