Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2018
Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 on carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: results of the impact of probiotics for reducing infections in veterans (IMPROVE) study.
Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01321606 (IMpact of PRObiotics for Reducing Infections in VEterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
IMpact of PRObiotics for Reducing Infections in VEterans: The IMPROVE Study
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Synergistic potential of probiotics and bacteriophages in combating multidrug-resistant microbial infections: A novel therapeutic strategy for the post-antibiotic era.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- A review on antibiotic and non-antibiotic decolonization strategies of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract.Infection · 2026Review
- Butyrate-Producing Mixed Probiotics Alleviate MRSA-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Mice by Promoting M2 Macrophage Polarization.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- From cholera to food poisoning: exploring the antidiarrheal activity of a multi-species water-based probiotic product.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Staphylococcus aureus colonisation and strategies for decolonisation.The Lancet. Microbe · 2024Review
- Pharmacotechnical aspects of a stable probiotic formulation toward multidrug-resistance antibacterial activity: design and quality control.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Probiotics and Their Bioproducts: A Promising Approach for Targeting Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Gut Microbiota Modulation and Prevention of Dysbiosis as an Alternative Approach to Antimicrobial Resistance: A Narrative Review.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2022Review
- Probiotics and intestinal decolonization of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms; A reality or fantasy?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- AFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Immunological consequences of microbiome-based therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- The aging gut microbiome and its impact on host immunity.Genes and immunity · 2021Review
- Antibiotic Resistance Crisis: An Update on Antagonistic Interactions between Probiotics and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Current microbiology · 2021Review
- Potential Application of Combined Therapy with Lectins as a Therapeutic Strategy for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Short-Term Tolerability, Safety, and Gut Microbial Composition Responses to a Multi-Strain Probiotic Supplement: An Open-Label Study in Healthy Adults.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Effects of the Administration ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Gut Microbiota Modulation: Implications for Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship.Advances in therapy · 2020Review
- The Role of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics in Combating Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.Clinical therapeutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfection by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Colonization by S. aureus increases the risk of infection. Little is known about decolonization strategies for S. aureus beyond antibiotics, however probiotics represent a promising alternative. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 in reducing carriage of S. aureus at multiple body sites.
methodsOne hundred thirteen subjects, positive for S. aureus carriage, were recruited from the William S. Middleton Memorial Medical Center, Madison, WI, USA, and randomized by initial site of colonization, either gastrointestinal (GI) or extra-GI, to 4-weeks of oral L. rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, or placebo. Nasal, oropharyngeal, and axillary/groin swabs were obtained, and serial blood and fecal samples were collected. Differences in prevalence of S. aureus carriage at the end of the 4-weeks of treatment were assessed.
resultsThe probiotic and placebo groups were similar in age, gender, and health history at baseline. S. aureus colonization within the stool samples of the extra-GI group was 15% lower in the probiotic than placebo group at the endpoint of the trial. Those in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group had 73% reduced odds (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.98) of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus presence, and 83% reduced odds (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.73) of any S. aureus presence in the stool sample at endpoint.
conclusionUse of daily oral L. rhamnosus HN001 reduced odds of carriage of S. aureus in the GI tract, however it did not eradicate S. aureus from other body sites.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01321606 . Registered March 21, 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.