ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Anticooperative Nearest-Neighbor Interactions between Residues in Unfolded Peptides and Proteins.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nearest-Neighbor Effects in Short Unfolded Peptides: An Assessment of Molecular Dynamics Force Fields.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Nearest neighbour interactions between amino acid residues in short peptides and coil libraries.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Exploring Nearest Neighbor Interactions and Their Influence on the Gibbs Energy Landscape of Unfolded Proteins and Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Randomizing of Oligopeptide Conformations by Nearest Neighbor Interactions between Amino Acid Residues.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Short peptides as predictors for the structure of polyarginine sequences in disordered proteins.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Compactness of Protein Folds Alters Disulfide-Bond Reducibility by Three Orders of Magnitude: A Comprehensive Kinetic Case Study on the Reduction of Differently Sized Tryptophan Cage Model Proteins.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2020Article
- NAGbinder: An approach for identifying N-acetylglucosamine interacting residues of a protein from its primary sequence.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that the conformational distributions of amino acid residues in unfolded peptides and proteins depend on the nature of the nearest neighbors. To explore whether the underlying interactions would lead to a breakdown of the isolated pair hypothesis of the classical random coil model, we further analyzed the conformational propensities that were recently obtained for the two guest residues (x,y) of GxyG tetrapeptides. We constructed a statistical thermodynamics model that allows for cooperative as well as for anticooperative interactions between adjacent residues adopting either a polyproline II or a β-strand conformation. Our analysis reveals that the nearest-neighbor interactions between most of the central residues in the investigated GxyG peptides are anticooperative. Interaction Gibbs energies are rather large at high temperatures (350 K), at which point many proteins undergo thermal unfolding. At room temperature, these interaction energies are less pronounced. We used the obtained interaction parameter in a Zimm-Bragg/Ising-type approach to calculate the temperature dependence of the ultraviolet circular dichroism (CD) of the MAX3 peptide, which is predominantly built by KV repeats. The agreement between simulation and experimental data was found to be satisfactory. Finally, we analyzed the temperature dependence of the CD and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.