Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29538728›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2018

From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach.

Charlotte C Poot, Rianne M van der Kleij, Evelyn A Brakema, Debbie Vermond, Siân Williams, Liza Cragg, Jos M van den Broek, Niels H Chavannes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte C PootDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rianne M van der KleijDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evelyn A BrakemaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Debbie VermondDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Siân WilliamsInternational Primary Care Respiratory Group, IPCRG, PO Box 11961, Westhill AB32 9AE, UK.
Liza CraggInternational Primary Care Respiratory Group, IPCRG, PO Box 11961, Westhill AB32 9AE, UK.
Jos M van den BroekDepartment Science Communication & Society, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of communication, their role in knowledge creation is still limited. Hence, this article aims to provide researchers a systematic approach on how knowledge creation can be put into practice. Methods: A systematic two-phased approach towards knowledge creation was formulated and executed. First, during a preparation phase the purpose and audience of the knowledge were defined. Subsequently, a developmental phase facilitated how the content is 'said' (language) and communicated (channel). This developmental phase proceeded via two pathways: a translational cycle and design cycle, during which core translational and design components were incorporated. The entire approach was demonstrated by a case study. Results: The case study demonstrated how the phases in this systematic approach can be operationalised. It furthermore illustrated how created knowledge can be delivered. Conclusion: The proposed approach offers researchers a systematic, practical and easy-to-implement tool to facilitate effective knowledge creation towards decision-makers in healthcare. Through the integration of core components of knowledge creation evidence-informed decision making will ultimately be optimized.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Information ExchangeTranslational Research, BiomedicalHumansPolicy MakingPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID29538728
PMCPMC5896638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.