Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29538666›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2018

Modeling Dynamic Food Choice Processes to Understand Dietary Intervention Effects.

Christopher Steven Marcum, Megan R Goldring, Colleen M McBride, Susan Persky

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher Steven MarcumSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Megan R GoldringDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Colleen M McBrideDepartment of Behavioral Sciences & Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Susan PerskySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

Eating and Feeding Behavior: Exploring Phenotypes and Influencing OutcomesZIAHG200396 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PERSKY, SUSAN · 2015 to 2025
$2.4M
Methodological DevelopmentZIAHG200397 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2016 to 2025
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meal construction is largely governed by nonconscious and habit-based processes that can be represented as a collection of in dividual, micro-level food choices that eventually give rise to a final plate. Despite this, dietary behavior intervention research rarely captures these micro-level food choice processes, instead measuring outcomes at aggregated levels. This is due in part to a dearth of analytic techniques to model these dynamic time-series events. Purpose: The current article addresses this limitation by applying a generalization of the relational event framework to model micro-level food choice behavior following an educational intervention. Method: Relational event modeling was used to model the food choices that 221 mothers made for their child following receipt of an information-based intervention. Participants were randomized to receive either (a) control information; (b) childhood obesity risk information; (c) childhood obesity risk information plus a personalized family history-based risk estimate for their child. Participants then made food choices for their child in a virtual reality-based food buffet simulation. Results: Micro-level aspects of the built environment, such as the ordering of each food in the buffet, were influential. Other dynamic processes such as choice inertia also influenced food selection. Among participants receiving the strongest intervention condition, choice inertia decreased and the overall rate of food selection increased. Conclusions: Modeling food selection processes can elucidate the points at which interventions exert their influence. Researchers can leverage these findings to gain insight into nonconscious and uncontrollable aspects of food selection that influence dietary outcomes, which can ultimately improve the design of dietary interventions.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentChoice BehaviorFood PreferencesHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionMaternal BehaviorAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMothersOverweightPediatric Obesity

Identifiers

PMID29538666
PMCPMC6693039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.