Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29538662›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2018

Enhancing Smoking Risk Communications: The Influence of Health Literacy and Message Content.

Diana Stewart Hoover, David W Wetter, Damon J Vidrine, Nga Nguyen, Summer G Frank, Yisheng Li, Andrew J Waters, Cathy D Meade, Jennifer I Vidrine

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Differential Responses to Cigarette Package Labeling Alternatives Among Adults Who Smoke: Results From a Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Racial/ethnic discrimination and racial trauma: Concurrent evaluation among Black adults who smoke in the United States.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors Associated with Cancer Message Believability: a Mixed Methods Study on Simulated Facebook Posts.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. How to tackle health literacy problems in chronic kidney disease patients? A systematic review to identify promising intervention targets and strategies.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Numeracy and memory for risk probabilities and risk outcomes depicted on cigarette warning labels.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diana Stewart HooverDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
David W WetterCenter for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Damon J VidrineStephenson Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.
Nga NguyenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Summer G FrankStephenson Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.
Yisheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Andrew J WatersDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Services, Bethesda, USA.
Cathy D MeadeDivision of Population Science, Health Outcomes, and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
Jennifer I VidrineStephenson Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JUDITH A JAMES · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Michael S. Businelle · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Literacy and Smoking Risk CommunicationsR01CA125413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VIDRINE, JENNIFER IRVIN · 2007 to 2009
$878k
Health Literacy and Smoking Cessation in Low-SES, Diverse SmokersK23DA040933 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HOOVER, DIANA STEWART · 2016 to 2018
$500k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125413NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA040933NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Efforts are needed to ensure that smokers with lower health literacy are provided with understandable and impactful information about the health consequences of smoking and benefits of quitting. Purpose: To test the influence of health literacy on smokers' responses to health risk messages manipulated on framing (gain vs. loss) and emotionality (factual vs. emotional). Methods: Participants (N = 402) were randomized to evaluate one of four sets of smoking risk messages (factual gain-framed, factual loss-framed, emotional gain-framed, or emotional loss-framed). Multiple linear regressions examined main effects of health literacy, message emotionality, and message framing on: (a) risk perceptions, (b) behavioral expectations (i.e. cut down, limit, quit), and (c) risk knowledge. Two-way interactions of health literacy with emotionality and framing were examined for these outcomes. Analyses were based on theory-driven, a priori hypotheses. Results: As hypothesized, main effects emerged such that smokers with higher health literacy reported stronger risk perceptions and knowledge retention regardless of message type. Additionally, emotional (vs. factual) and gain- (vs. loss-) framed messages were associated with certain lower risk perceptions regardless of health literacy level. Consistent with hypotheses, two-way crossover interactions emerged between health literacy and emotionality. Among smokers with higher health literacy, factual messages produced higher perceived risk and stronger expectations for quitting. Among smokers with lower health literacy, emotional messages produced higher perceived risk and stronger expectations for quitting. Conclusions: Health literacy plays an important role in influencing how smokers respond to different risk messages. One's health literacy should be considered when determining whether risk communications emphasize factual or emotional content.

Indexed as

EmotionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyPersuasive CommunicationSmokingAdultFemaleHealth CommunicationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRiskSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID29538662
PMCPMC5942894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.