ArticlePloS one2018
Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index and major adverse cardiac events in patients following acute myocardial infarction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Trial
- Functional and structural reverse myocardial remodeling following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022Trial
- Artificial intelligence fully automated myocardial strain quantification for risk stratification following acute myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Recovery of right ventricular function and strain in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and concurrent chronic total occlusion.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Trial
- Culprit vessel-related myocardial mechanics and prognostic implications following acute myocardial infarction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Trial
- Effect of comprehensive initial training on the variability of left ventricular measures using fast-SENC cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Left ventricular deformation predicts major adverse cardiac events following acute myocardial infarction independently of afterload and ventricular-arterial coupling.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Differential Biventricular Strain Recovery With Selective Fibrosis Biomarker Regression After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective CMR Feature-Tracking Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Manual long axis strain compared to automated feature-tracking deformation imaging for identification of masked left heart involvement in pulmonary hypertension.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Impact of epicardial adipose tissue on myocardial function and structure in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- The Impact of Model-based Deep-learning Reconstruction Compared with that of Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding on the Image Quality and Precision of Cine Cardiac MR in Evaluating Left-ventricular Volume and Strain: A Study on Healthy Volunteers.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Left ventricular global longitudinal strain adds incremental value for risk prediction in unselected clinical patients.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Native T1 adds independent value for cardiovascular risk assessment beyond global longitudinal strain in an all-comers real-world clinical patient population.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Post-Myocardial Infarction Remodeling and Hyperkinetic Remote Myocardium in Sheep Measured by Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Retrospective temporal resolution interpolation alters myocardial strain quantification on compressed sensing cine CMR.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Impact of epicardial adipose tissue on cardiac function and morphology in patients with diastolic dysfunction.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Cardiac function in a large animal model of myocardial infarction at 7 T: deep learning based automatic segmentation increases reproducibility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comprehensive characterization of cardiac contraction for improved post-infarction risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived hemodynamic force assessments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Myocardial injury and clinical outcome in octogenarians after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimSince cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature-tracking (CMR-FT) has been demonstrated to be of incremental clinical merit we investigated the interchangeability of global left and right ventricular strain parameters between different CMR-FT software solutions. MATERIAL AND
methodsCMR-cine images of 10 patients without significant reduction in LVEF and RVEF and 10 patients with a significantly impaired systolic function were analyzed using two different types of FT-software (TomTec, Germany; QStrain, Netherlands). Global longitudinal strains (LV GLS, RV GLS), global left ventricular circumferential (GCS) and radial strains (GRS) were assessed. Differences in intra- and inter-observer variability within and between software types based on single and up to three repeated and subsequently averaged measurements were evaluated.
resultsInter-vendor agreement was highest for GCS followed by LV GLS. GRS and RV GLS showed lower inter-vendor agreement. Variability was consistently higher in healthy volunteers as compared to the patient group. Intra-vendor reproducibility was excellent for GCS, LV GLS and RV GLS, but lower for GRS. The impact of repeated measurements was most pronounced for GRS and RV GLS on an intra-vendor level.
conclusionCardiac pathology has no influence on CMR-FT reproducibility. LV GLS and GCS qualify as the most robust parameters within and between individual software types. Since both parameters can be interchangeably assessed with different software solutions they may enter the clinical arena for optimized diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in various pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.