ArticlePloS one2018
Superior ab initio identification, annotation and characterisation of TEs and segmental duplications from genome assemblies.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- A chromosome-scale genome assembly of Wu's rock agama (Laudakia wui) from low-altitude habitats.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Insights into natural neocentromere evolution from a cattle T2T X chromosome.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Concise Guide for the Characterization and Curation of Transposable Elements in Insect Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Teaching transposon classification as a means to crowd source the curation of repeat annotation - a tardigrade perspective.Mobile DNA · 2024Article
- Multiple horizontal transfer events of a DNA transposon into turtles, fishes, and a frog.Mobile DNA · 2024Article
- Optimizing Trilobatin Production via Screening and Modification of Glycosyltransferases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic analysis of a medicinal snake,Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Article
- Whole-genome sequencing and evolutionary analysis of the wild edible mushroom,Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Genome assembly composition of the String "ACGT" array: a review of data structure accuracy and performance challenges.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Article
- Methodologies for theGenes · 2022Review
- Accumulation and ineffective silencing of transposable elements on an avian W Chromosome.Genome research · 2022Article
- Reactivation of transposable elements following hybridization in fission yeast.Genome research · 2022Article
- Genome Stability Is in the Eye of the Beholder: CR1 Retrotransposon Activity Varies Significantly across Avian Diversity.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Assembled and Annotated Genome of the Fairy-Ring Fungus Marasmius oreades.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- De novo whole-genome assembly and resequencing resources for the roan (Hippotragus equinus), an iconic African antelope.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- New Environment, New Invaders-Repeated Horizontal Transfer of LINEs to Sea Snakes.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- RepeatFiller newly identifies megabases of aligning repetitive sequences and improves annotations of conserved non-exonic elements.GigaScience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposable Elements (TEs) are mobile DNA sequences that make up significant fractions of amniote genomes. However, they are difficult to detect and annotate ab initio because of their variable features, lengths and clade-specific variants. We have addressed this problem by refining and developing a Comprehensive ab initio Repeat Pipeline (CARP) to identify and cluster TEs and other repetitive sequences in genome assemblies. The pipeline begins with a pairwise alignment using krishna, a custom aligner. Single linkage clustering is then carried out to produce families of repetitive elements. Consensus sequences are then filtered for protein coding genes and then annotated using Repbase and a custom library of retrovirus and reverse transcriptase sequences. This process yields three types of family: fully annotated, partially annotated and unannotated. Fully annotated families reflect recently diverged/young known TEs present in Repbase. The remaining two types of families contain a mixture of novel TEs and segmental duplications. These can be resolved by aligning these consensus sequences back to the genome to assess copy number vs. length distribution. Our pipeline has three significant advantages compared to other methods for ab initio repeat identification: 1) we generate not only consensus sequences, but keep the genomic intervals for the original aligned sequences, allowing straightforward analysis of evolutionary dynamics, 2) consensus sequences represent low-divergence, recently/currently active TE families, 3) segmental duplications are annotated as a useful by-product. We have compared our ab initio repeat annotations for 7 genome assemblies to other methods and demonstrate that CARP compares favourably with RepeatModeler, the most widely used repeat annotation package.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.