Trial reportPloS one2018
Neural tube defects: Sex ratio changes after fortification with folic acid.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of mandatory folic acid fortification compared with pre-fortification periods on reducing neural tube defects (NTDs): a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Global prevalence of congenital anencephaly: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive health · 2022Pooled it
- Reassessing Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification for Neural Tube Defect Prevention: Evidence, Uncertainty, and Policy Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
- No Evidence of Impact of Genetic Sex on Hyperthermia-Induced Neural Tube Defects in Chicken Embryos.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- Correction: Neural tube defects: Sex ratio changes after fortification with folic acid.PloS one · 2026Article
- Epidemiological insights into neural tube and orofacial malformations in Chile using data from the National Registry of Congenital Anomalies (RENACH).BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Human organoids potentially boost research into environmental factors of neural tube defects.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Maternal Folic Acid and Dietary Folate Intake in Relation to Sex Ratio at Birth and Sex-Specific Birth Weight in China.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Pin1 Downregulation Is Involved in Excess Retinoic Acid-Induced Failure of Neural Tube Closure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Association of maternal ABO blood type with lesion level and birthweight of children with spina bifida: a descriptive study.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- Factors associated with infant sex and preterm birth status for selected birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.Birth defects research · 2024Article
- Article
- Periconceptional folic acid use prevents both rare and common neural tube defects in China.Birth defects research · 2022Article
- Efficacy of microsurgery for congenital neural tube defects in newborns.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Article
- Maternal folic acid and multivitamin supplementation: International clinical evidence with considerations for the prevention of folate-sensitive birth defects.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Review
- Closing in on Mechanisms of Open Neural Tube Defects.Trends in neurosciences · 2020Review
- Genetic Engineering for Global Food Security: Photosynthesis and Biofortification.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Periconceptional folic acid supplementation and sex difference in prevention of neural tube defects and their subtypes in China: results from a large prospective cohort study.Nutrition journal · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHistorically, neural tube defects (NTDs) have predominated in female infants but the reasons remain unclear. In South America, the pre- folic acid fortification (FAF) rates of NTDs were around 18/10,000 births for females and 12/10,000 births for males, with an estimated sex ratio (male/female) of 0.67. During the post- FAF period, unpublished routine reports have indicated changes in the sex ratio for these defects while some descriptive reports are controversial. To date and to our knowledge, however, no studies specifically focusing on these changes to test this hypothesis directly have been undertaken. The aim of this study was to analyze changes in the sex ratio of infants with NTDs after FAF in South American countries. MATERIALS AND
methodsWith a descriptive cross-sectional study design, 2,597 infants with isolated NTDs born between 1990 and 2013 in 3 countries participating in the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC) network were included: (Chile N = 521 and Argentina N = 1,619 [with FAF policies]; Venezuela N = 457 [without FAF policies; used as control]; total births = 2,229,561). The differences-in-differences method and Poisson regressions were used to evaluate the sex ratio shift from female to male before vs. after FAF, and to assess whether these differences were related to the fortification. RESULTS AND
conclusionsIn Chile and Argentina the prevalence of NTDs, particularly anencephaly and cervico-thoracic spina bifida, showed a greater reduction rate in females than in males after FAF, resulting in a change of the sex ratio of infants with NTDs. Some mechanisms possibly involved in this differential reduction are proposed which might be useful to identify the pathogenesis of NTDs as a whole and specifically of those susceptible to the protective effect of folic acid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.