Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29538303›Full record

ReviewGenes2018

Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae.

Tomasz Stępkowski, Joanna Banasiewicz, Camille E Granada, Mitchell Andrews, Luciane M P Passaglia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The invasive legumeEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Permanent draft genome sequence ofJournal of genomics · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lupin Root Weevils (Insects · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tomasz StępkowskiAutonomous Department of Microbial Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. sttommic@yahoo.co.uk.
Joanna BanasiewiczAutonomous Department of Microbial Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. banasiewicz.joanna0@gmail.com.
Camille E GranadaUniversidade do Vale do Taquari-UNIVATES, Rua Avelino Tallini, 171, 95900-000 Lajeado, RS, Brazil. cegranada@univates.br.
Mitchell AndrewsFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand. mitchell.andrews@lincoln.ac.nz.
Luciane M P PassagliaDepartamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Caixa Postal 15.053, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. luciane.passaglia@ufrgs.br.
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PLLincoln University · NZUnivates · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The legume tribe Genisteae comprises 618, predominantly temperate species, showing an amphi-Atlantic distribution that was caused by several long-distance dispersal events. Seven out of the 16 authenticated rhizobial genera can nodulate particular Genisteae species.

Indexed as

BradyrhizobiumGenisteaeMicrovirganifDnodAphylogeography

Identifiers

PMID29538303
PMCPMC5867884
OpenAlexW2789788492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.