ReviewSexually transmitted diseases2018
Congenital and Heterosexual Syphilis: Still Part of the Problem.
Review in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics of neurosyphilis: analysis of symptoms and risk factors.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Lack of Serological Response by Delivery to Syphilis Treatment Does Not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Incidence and associated factors of congenital syphilis at a tertiary care center in Thailand.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Pregnant Women With Syphilis and Factors Associated With Congenital Syphilis at a Chicago Hospital.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Gaps in the congenital syphilis prevention cascade: qualitative findings from Kern County, California.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Syphilis is a Rare Cause of Erythema Nodosum: A Case Report.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Exploring How Epidemic Context Influences Syphilis Screening Impact: A Mathematical Modeling Study.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.