Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29537342›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2018

High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures.

Marc Randall Kristensen, Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen, Brian Elmengaard, Steen Lund Jensen, Bo Sanderhoff Olsen, Stig Brorson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Minimum 2-year results of the second-generation CFR-PEEK locking plate on the proximal humeral fracture.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marc Randall Kristensena Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussena Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Brian Elmengaardb Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.
Steen Lund Jensenc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Aalborg University Hospital , Aalborg , Denmark.
Bo Sanderhoff Olsena Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Stig Brorsond Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Køge , Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - It is unclear whether previous osteosynthesis is a risk factor for inferior outcome following shoulder arthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture. We used data from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR) to examine this question. Patients and methods - All 285 patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis of a proximal humeral fracture reported to DSR from 2006 to 2013 were included. Each case was matched with 2 controls (570) treated with a primary shoulder arthroplasty for an acute proximal humeral fracture. Patient reported outcome was assessed using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS) and the relative risk of revision was reported. Results - The mean WOOS was 46 (SD 25) for a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis and 52 (27) after a primary shoulder arthroplasty. The relative risk of revision for a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis was 2 with a primary arthroplasty for fracture as reference. In a separate analysis of patients treated by locking plate the mean WOOS was 46 (24), with a relative risk of revision at 1.5 with a primary arthroplasty as reference. Interpretation - Compared with primary arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture, we found an inferior patient-reported outcome and a substantial risk of revision for patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis for a proximal humeral fracture. The risk and burdens of additional surgery should be accounted for when deciding on the primary surgical procedure.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderFracture Fixation, InternalReoperationAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsShoulder FracturesTreatment Failure

Identifiers

PMID29537342
PMCPMC6055779
OpenAlexW2789810569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.