Commentary: Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Critical Care Clinician-Researchers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Pediatric Critical Care in Resource Limited Settings-Lessening the Gap Through Ongoing Collaboration, Advancement in Research and Technological Innovations.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021
   Review
2. Pakistan Registry of Intensive CarE (PRICE): Expanding a lower middle-income, clinician-designed critical care registry in South Asia.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2019
   Article
3. Addressing the information deficit in global health: lessons from a digital acute care platform in Sri Lanka.BMJ global health · 2019
   Article
4. Experiences of ICU survivors in a low middle income country- a multicenter study.BMC anesthesiology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Critical Care Clinician-Researchers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.2017

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as