ReviewJournal of neural engineering2018
Optogenetic dissection of ictogenesis: in search of a targeted anti-epileptic therapy.
Review in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular basis for and chemogenetic modulation of comorbidities in GABRG2-deficient epilepsies.Epilepsia · 2019Article
- "Are We There Yet?" Quest for Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy.Epilepsy currents · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
For over a century, epileptic seizures have been characterized as a state of pathological, hypersynchronous brain activity. Anti-epileptic therapies have been developed largely based on the dogma that the altered brain rhythms result from an overabundance of glutamatergic activity or insufficient GABAergic inhibition. The most effective drugs in use today act to globally decrease excitation, increase inhibition, or decrease all activity. Unfortunately, such broad alterations to brain activity often lead to impactful side effects such as drowsiness, cognitive impairment, and sleep disruption. Recent advances in optical imaging, optogenetics, and chemogenetics have made it feasible to record and alter neuronal activity with single neuron resolution and genetically directed targeting. The goal of this review it to summarize the usage of these research tools in the study of ictogenesis (seizure generation) and propose a translational pathway by which these studies could result in novel clinical therapies. This manuscript is not intended to serve as an exhaustive list of optogenetic tools nor as a summary of all optogenetic manipulations in epilepsy research. Rather, we will focus on the tools and research aimed at dissecting the basic neuron-level interactions underlying ictogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.