ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2018
Resuscitation of viable but non-culturable bacteria to enhance the cellulose-degrading capability of bacterial community in composting.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Succeed to culture a novel lineage symbiotic bacterium ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Wake Up! Resuscitation of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria: Mechanism and Potential Application.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Exploring potential bacterial populations for enhanced anthraquinone dyes biodegradation: a critical review.Biotechnology letters · 2022Review
- Enzymatic properties and biological activity of resuscitation-promoting factor B ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Optimization of bacterial cytokine protein production by response surface methodology for environmental bioremediation.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Strategies for culturing active/dormant marine microbes.Marine life science & technology · 2021Review
- Viable but nonculturable bacteria and their resuscitation: implications for cultivating uncultured marine microorganisms.Marine life science & technology · 2021Review
- Enrichment and characterization of an effective hexavalent chromium-reducing microbial community YEM001.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Exploring the Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Resuscitation of viable but non-culturable bacteria to enhance the cellulose-degrading capability of bacterial community in composting.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, much of what we know regarding the isolated cellulolytic bacteria comes from the conventional plate separation techniques. However, the culturability of many bacterial species is controlled by resuscitation-promoting factors (Rpfs) due to entering a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state. Therefore, in this study, Rpf from Micrococcus luteus was added in the culture medium to evaluate its role in bacterial isolation and enhanced effects on cellulose-degrading capability of bacterial community in the compost. It was found that Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were two main phyla in the compost sample. The introduction of Rpf could isolate some unique bacterial species. The cellulase activity of enrichment cultures with and without Rpf treatment revealed that Rpf treatment significantly enhanced cellulase activity. Ten isolates unique in Rpf addition displayed carboxymethyl-cellulase (CMCase) activity, while six isolates possessed filter paper cellulase (FPCase) activity. This study provides new insights into broader cellulose degraders, which could be utilized for enhancing cellulosic waste treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.