Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29536423›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Temporal dynamics of gut microbiota in triclocarban-exposed weaned rats.

Rebekah C Kennedy, Russell R Fling, Michael S Robeson, Arnold M Saxton, Liesel G Schneider, John L Darcy, David A Bemis, Ling Zhao, Jiangang Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekah C KennedyDepartment of Public Health, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Russell R FlingDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Michael S RobesonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Arnold M SaxtonDepartment of Animal Science, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Liesel G SchneiderDepartment of Animal Science, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
John L DarcyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
David A BemisDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Ling ZhaoDepartment of Nutrition, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Jiangang ChenDepartment of Public Health, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. jchen38@utk.edu.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

In utero and neonatal effects of triclocarban exposureR21ES017475 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI CHEN, JIANGANG · 2010 to 2011
$423k
NIEHS NIH HHS 1R21ES017475-01A1NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES017475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widely used as an antimicrobial in antibacterial bar soaps, triclocarban (3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide; TCC) is effective against Gram-positive bacteria but shows little efficacy against Gram-negative strains, potentially altering the composition of indigenous microflora within and on the human body. To date, the consequence of continuous or previous nonprescription antimicrobial exposure from compounds in personal care products on commensal microflora is still elusive. Previous research has shown that TCC exposure during gestation and lactation induced dysbiosis of gut microbial communities among exposed dams and neonates. However, the impact of antimicrobial exposure specifically after discontinuation of the use of TCC on the gut microbiota has not been investigated. In this study, weaned Sprague Dawley rats (postnatal day, PND 22) were provided ad lib access to TCC-supplemented diet (0.2% w/w or 0.5% w/w) for 4 weeks (phase I) followed by a 4-week washout period (phase II) to determine gut microflora changes both during continuous exposure to TCC and to determine the potential rebound following TCC withdrawal. Fecal samples were collected at baseline (PND 22) prior to TCC exposure and throughout phase I and phase II. The V4 region of 16S rDNA was sequenced from extracted total fecal DNA with the MiSeq platform. Exposure to both 0.2% w/w and 0.5% w/w TCC was sufficient to alter diversity of microbiota during phase I of treatment. This effect was further prolonged into phase II, even when TCC exposure was discontinued. Collectively, these data highlight the impact of both continuous and prior TCC exposure on gut microbial ecology and shed light onto the potential long-term health risk of daily nonprescription antimicrobial personal care product use.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCarbanilidesFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyWater Pollutants, ChemicalWeaningAnti-Infective AgentsCarbanilidestriclocarbanWater Pollutants, Chemical16S rDNAAntimicrobialAntisepticGut microbiotaMicrobiotaTriclocarbanWeaned rats

Identifiers

PMID29536423
OpenAlexW2791422627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.