Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29536291›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2018

Feasibility study of a novel general purpose CZT-based digital SPECT camera: initial clinical results.

Elinor Goshen, Leonid Beilin, Eli Stern, Tal Kenig, Ronen Goldkorn, Simona Ben-Haim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bias and precision of SPECT-basedEJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  10. 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras:EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  11. EANM perspectives for CZT SPECT in brain applications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamic cardiac SPECT with flow measurement using 3D-ring CZT: when SPECT is inspired by PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elinor GoshenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel. elinorgoshen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-3566
Leonid BeilinMolecular Dynamics, Hamilton, Bermuda.
Eli SternMolecular Dynamics, Hamilton, Bermuda.
Tal KenigMolecular Dynamics, Hamilton, Bermuda.
Ronen GoldkornSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Simona Ben-HaimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe performance of a prototype novel digital single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) camera with multiple pixelated CZT detectors and high sensitivity collimators (Digital SPECT; Valiance X12 prototype, Molecular Dynamics) was evaluated in various clinical settings. Images obtained in the prototype system were compared to images from an analog camera fitted with high-resolution collimators. Clinical feasibility, image quality, and diagnostic performance of the prototype were evaluated in 36 SPECT studies in 35 patients including bone (n = 21), brain (n = 5), lung perfusion (n = 3), and parathyroid (n = 3) and one study each of sentinel node and labeled white blood cells. Images were graded on a scale of 1-4 for sharpness, contrast, overall quality, and diagnostic confidence.

resultsDigital CZT SPECT provided a statistically significant improvement in sharpness and contrast in clinical cases (mean score of 3.79 ± 0.61 vs. 3.26 ± 0.50 and 3.92 ± 0.29 vs. 3.34 ± 0.47 respectively, p < 0.001 for both). Overall image quality was slightly higher for the digital SPECT but not statistically significant (3.74 vs. 3.66).

conclusionCZT SPECT provided significantly improved image sharpness and contrast compared to the analog system in the clinical settings evaluated. Further studies will evaluate the diagnostic performance of the system in large patient cohorts in additional clinical settings.

Indexed as

ClinicalCZTGeneral purposeSPECT

Identifiers

PMID29536291
PMCPMC5849748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.