ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2018
A novel ultrasonic method for evaluation of blood clotting parameters.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Low-Frequency Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducer for Biological Tissue Sonication.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFor long time, blood clot retraction was measured only by thromboelastographic or platelet contractile force measurement techniques. The purpose of the present study was development of a novel ultrasonic method based on simultaneous monitoring of variations in the ultrasound velocity and the frequency spectrum of the signal propagating in clotting blood and its application for automatic evaluation of blood clotting parameters.
methodsSimultaneous measurement of ultrasound velocity and variations in the frequency spectrum of wideband ultrasonic signals in clotting blood samples was performed. All measurements were performed in pulse-echo mode. Standard clinical data were obtained using routine clinical laboratory methods.
resultsThe amplitudes of ultrasonic signals during native blood coagulation varied up to ten times for different frequencies. The measurement results of the start and duration of blood clot retraction differed between patient samples: different components of the blood coagulation system had significant impact on the blood clot retraction process.
conclusionsOur results showed that during blood clotting, the ultrasound velocity and variations in frequency spectrum should be used simultaneously to determine the beginning and duration of blood clot retraction. Our results also showed that blood clot retraction is controlled by the activity of factor XIII.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29536280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.