Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29536204›Full record

ArticleChemistry Central journal2018

Optimized method for determination of 16 FDA polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mainstream cigarette smoke by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Jana Jeffery, Maria Carradus, Karolina Songin, Michael Pettit, Karl Pettit, Christopher Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry Central journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Carcinogenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke: A 2022 update.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mainstream smoke constituents andToxicology reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jana JefferyBritish American Tobacco, Research and Development, Southampton, UK. jana_jeffery@bat.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6407-0169
Maria CarradusMarchwood Scientific Services, 371 Millbrook Rd W, Southampton, UK.
Karolina SonginMarchwood Scientific Services, 371 Millbrook Rd W, Southampton, UK.
Michael PettitMarchwood Scientific Services, 371 Millbrook Rd W, Southampton, UK.
Karl PettitMarchwood Scientific Services, 371 Millbrook Rd W, Southampton, UK.
Christopher WrightBritish American Tobacco, Research and Development, Southampton, UK.
British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method was validated for the determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the FDA list of 93 harmful or potentially harmful constituents of mainstream cigarette smoke (MCS). Target analytes were extracted from total particulate matter using accelerated solvent extraction with a toluene/ethanol solvent mixture. Matrix artefacts were removed by two-step solid-phase extraction process. Three different GC-MS systems [GC-MS (single quadrupole), GC-MS/MS (triple quadrupole) and GC-HRMS (high resolution, magnetic sector)] using the same separation conditions were compared for the analysis of MCS of 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarettes generated under ISO and intense smoking regimes. The high mass resolution (m/∆m ≥ 10,000) and associated selectivity of detection by GC-HRMS provided the highest quality data for the target PAHs in MCS. Owing to the HR data acquisition mode enabling measurement of accurate mass, limits of quantification for PAHs were 5 to 15-fold lower for GC-HRMS than for GC-MS/MS and GC-MS. The presented study illustrates that the optimised sample preparation strategy followed by GC-HRMS analysis provides a fit-for-purpose and robust analytical approach allowing measurement of PAHs at (ultra)low concentrations in MCS. Furthermore, the study illustrates the importance and benefits of robust sample preparation and clean-up to compensate for limited selectivity when low-resolution MS is used.

Indexed as

Accelerated solvent extractionGas chromatography–mass spectrometryHigh resolution mass spectrometryLow resolution mass spectrometryMainstream cigarette smokePolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

Identifiers

PMID29536204
PMCPMC5849724
OpenAlexW2791081669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.