ReviewDer Nervenarzt2018
[Principles of autoimmune and paraneoplastic encephalitis].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Autoimmune Encephalitis: An Observational Monocentric Study of 38 Patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitides are now well-established entities. Detection of neural autoantibodies enables specific diagnoses, provides information on the underlying disease pathophysiology, immunological treatability and the likelihood of a tumor being the underlying cause. This is true for the "high ranking" neural antibodies that have been established in the context of circumscribed clinical images and in consideration of large control groups, have been found in the same way by other laboratories and they respond to immunotherapy. The immune reaction can be triggered by tumors and virus encephalitides, e.g. N‑methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antibodies. In some cases a genetic predisposition has been shown. Some antibodies are formed peripherally, others intrathecally. The route of the antibodies into the brain can be via the blood-brain barrier or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In the brain itself, the antibodies lead to an internalization of antigenic receptors, such as NMDA and α‑amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors, or to nerve-destroying activation of the classical complement cascade. In other conditions, cytotoxic T cells are at the core of the pathophysiology. For diagnostic purposes, the testing of CSF-serum pairs with broad spectrum antigen panels is recommended. Therapeutically, the aim is to suppress the production of pathogenic antibodies or even to eliminate them directly. A sequence of first-line treatment (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins and/or apheresis) and second-line treatment (rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide) has been established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.