Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29536029›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2017

De Novo Circulating Antidonor's Cell Antibodies During Induced Acute Rejection of Allogeneic Myofibers in Myogenic Cell Transplantation: A Study in Nonhuman Primates.

Daniel Skuk, Jacques P Tremblay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel SkukAxe Neurosciences, Research Center of the CHU de Quebec-CHUL, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Jacques P TremblayAxe Neurosciences, Research Center of the CHU de Quebec-CHUL, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Online Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransplantation of myogenic cells has potential applications in the treatment of muscle pathologies. Excluding purely autologous cell transplantation, graft viability depends on an adequate control of acute rejection (AR). To contribute in understanding AR in this context, we analyzed whether de novo circulating antibodies against donor's cells are detected during induced AR of graft-derived myofibers in nonhuman primates.

methodsWe allotransplanted satellite cell-derived myoblasts in macaques immunosuppressed with tacrolimus. To induce AR of graft-derived myofibers, we administered tacrolimus for 4 weeks to allow complete myofiber formation, and then we stopped tacrolimus administration. Cell-grafted sites were biopsied at tacrolimus withdrawal and then every 2 weeks and analyzed by histology until AR completion. Blood samples were taken before immunosuppression, at tacrolimus withdrawal and then every 2 weeks to detect antibodies against the donor's cells by flow cytometry.

resultsThere was an increase of antibodies against the donor's cells related to AR in all monkeys. This increase was variable in intensity, and preceded, coincided or followed the histological evidence of AR (focal accumulations of lymphocytes) and/or the loss of myofibers of donor origin, and remained until the end of the follow-up (up to 8 weeks after tacrolimus withdrawal).

conclusionsFlow cytometry detection of de novo circulating antibodies against the donor's cells was consistently associated with AR. A clear increase in this antibody detection indicated current or recent AR. Smaller increases in comparison to the preimmunosuppression values were not associated with AR.

Identifiers

PMID29536029
PMCPMC5828687
OpenAlexW2765819522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.