Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29535895›Full record

ArticleNeurointervention2018

The Combined Use of Intraluminal and Intrasaccular Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Report of 25 Cases.

Pervinder Bhogal, Muhammad AlMatter, Victoria Hellstern, Oliver Ganslandt, Hansjörg Bäzner, Hans Henkes, Marta Aguilar-Pérez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurointervention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Woven EndoBridge for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Results in 95 aneurysms from a single center.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Technical aspects of combined intrasaccular and endoluminal flow diversion.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pervinder BhogalNeuroradiological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Muhammad AlMatterNeuroradiological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Victoria HellsternNeuroradiological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Oliver GanslandtNeurosurgical Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Hansjörg BäznerNeurological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Hans HenkesNeuroradiological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Marta Aguilar-PérezNeuroradiological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Klinikum Stuttgart · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Medina Embolic Device (MED) is a new intrasaccular device with promising early results. Previously we documented our initial experience of this device both alone and in combination with other devices including flow diverter stents (FDS). We sought to determine the effect of the MED + FDS strategy for the treatment of selected aneurysms. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to identify all patients with aneurysms treated using both the MED and intraluminal FDS. We present our technical success rate, early and mid-term angiographic follow-up, and clinical outcome data.

resultsWe identified 25 non-consecutive patients. The treatment was staged in 9 patients and in a single session 16 patients. The average age was 61±12.8 years (range 40-82). The average fundus height was 11±3.6 mm and average fundus width was 10.1±3.4 mm. In the staged cohort (n=9) at delayed angiography (mean 10 mths) 8 aneurysms (89%) showed complete exclusion (mRRC 1) and in one patient there was a parent vessel occlusion. In the simultaneous cohort delayed angiography (n=10, mean 8.1 months) demonstrated complete occlusion (mRRC 1) in 6 aneurysms (60%), 3 neck remnants (mRRC 2) (30%) and 1 patient (10%) showed persistent aneurysmal filling (mRRC 3a). There were 5 complications with permanent morbidity (mRS >2) in two patients. There were no mortalities.

conclusionThe MED can be successfully used in combination with intraluminal FDS and in selected aneurysms this may represent an alternative to FDS and adjunctive coiling.

Indexed as

flow diversionIntracranial aneurysmMedina embolization device

Identifiers

PMID29535895
PMCPMC5847887
OpenAlexW2794298039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.