Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29535749›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

High Throughput Determination of Plant Height, Ground Cover, and Above-Ground Biomass in Wheat with LiDAR.

Jose A Jimenez-Berni, David M Deery, Pablo Rozas-Larraondo, Anthony Tony G Condon, Greg J Rebetzke, Richard A James, William D Bovill, Robert T Furbank, Xavier R R Sirault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jose A Jimenez-BerniHigh Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
David M DeeryCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Pablo Rozas-LarraondoHigh Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Anthony Tony G CondonCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Greg J RebetzkeCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Richard A JamesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
William D BovillCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Robert T FurbankHigh Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Xavier R R SiraultHigh Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop improvement efforts are targeting increased above-ground biomass and radiation-use efficiency as drivers for greater yield. Early ground cover and canopy height contribute to biomass production, but manual measurements of these traits, and in particular above-ground biomass, are slow and labor-intensive, more so when made at multiple developmental stages. These constraints limit the ability to capture these data in a temporal fashion, hampering insights that could be gained from multi-dimensional data. Here we demonstrate the capacity of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), mounted on a lightweight, mobile, ground-based platform, for rapid multi-temporal and non-destructive estimation of canopy height, ground cover and above-ground biomass. Field validation of LiDAR measurements is presented. For canopy height, strong relationships with LiDAR (

Indexed as

above-ground biomassfield experimentsLiDARNDVIplant phenomics

Identifiers

PMID29535749
PMCPMC5835033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.