ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018
Neuromodulated Synaptic Plasticity on the SpiNNaker Neuromorphic System.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-factor learning in spiking neural networks: An overview of methods and trends from a machine learning perspective.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- A survey and perspective on neuromorphic continual learning systems.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Effects of paired associative magnetic stimulation between nerve root and cortex on motor function of lower limbs after spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Neural regeneration research · 2022Article
- A Brain-Inspired Theory of Mind Spiking Neural Network for Reducing Safety Risks of Other Agents.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- PyGeNN: A Python Library for GPU-Enhanced Neural Networks.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- SpikePropamine: Differentiable Plasticity in Spiking Neural Networks.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- Demonstrating Advantages of Neuromorphic Computation: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Memory-Efficient Synaptic Connectivity for Spike-Timing- Dependent Plasticity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Structural Plasticity on the SpiNNaker Many-Core Neuromorphic System.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Deep Learning With Spiking Neurons: Opportunities and Challenges.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
- GPUs Outperform Current HPC and Neuromorphic Solutions in Terms of Speed and Energy When Simulating a Highly-Connected Cortical Model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- sPyNNaker: A Software Package for Running PyNN Simulations on SpiNNaker.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SpiNNaker is a digital neuromorphic architecture, designed specifically for the low power simulation of large-scale spiking neural networks at speeds close to biological real-time. Unlike other neuromorphic systems, SpiNNaker allows users to develop their own neuron and synapse models as well as specify arbitrary connectivity. As a result SpiNNaker has proved to be a powerful tool for studying different neuron models as well as synaptic plasticity-believed to be one of the main mechanisms behind learning and memory in the brain. A number of Spike-Timing-Dependent-Plasticity(STDP) rules have already been implemented on SpiNNaker and have been shown to be capable of solving various learning tasks in real-time. However, while STDP is an important biological theory of learning, it is a form of Hebbian or unsupervised learning and therefore does not explain behaviors that depend on feedback from the environment. Instead, learning rules based on neuromodulated STDP (three-factor learning rules) have been shown to be capable of solving reinforcement learning tasks in a biologically plausible manner. In this paper we demonstrate for the first time how a model of three-factor STDP, with the third-factor representing spikes from dopaminergic neurons, can be implemented on the SpiNNaker neuromorphic system. Using this learning rule we first show how reward and punishment signals can be delivered to a single synapse before going on to demonstrate it in a larger network which solves the credit assignment problem in a Pavlovian conditioning experiment. Because of its extra complexity, we find that our three-factor learning rule requires approximately 2× as much processing time as the existing SpiNNaker STDP learning rules. However, we show that it is still possible to run our Pavlovian conditioning model with up to 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.