Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29535535›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

The efficacy and safety of alectinib in the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Junsheng Fan, Zengfei Xia, Xiaoli Zhang, Yuqing Chen, Ruolan Qian, Sihan Liu, Danming You, Jian Zhang, Peng Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. "Undruggable KRAS": druggable after all.Genes & development · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Efficacy and safety of alectinib inTranslational lung cancer research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. AcquiredOncoTargets and therapy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Junsheng Fan *Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zengfei Xia *Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoli Zhang *Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuqing ChenDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruolan QianDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sihan LiuDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Danming YouDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng LuoDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlectinib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat crizotinib-refractory non-small cell lung cancer. We performed this meta-analysis to synthesize the results of different clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib.

methodsA search of 3 databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, was performed from the inception of each database through September 5, 2017. We have pooled the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival, and intracranial ORR to evaluate the efficacy of alectinib. Discontinuation rate, rate of dose reduction or interruption due to adverse events as well as the incidence of several adverse events were aggregated to evaluate its safety.

resultsA total of 8 studies with 626 patients have been included in our study. The pooled efficacy parameters are as follows: ORR 70% (95% CI: 57% to 82%), disease control rate 88% (95% CI: 82% to 94%), progression-free survival 9.36 months (95% CI: 7.38% to 11.34%), and intracranial ORR 52% (95% CI: 45% to 59%). ALK inhibitor-naïve patients tend to have better responses than crizotinib-pretreated patients. The aggregate discontinuation rate is 7% (95% CI: 4% to 10%), and the pooled rate of dose reduction or interruption is 33% (95% CI: 24% to 42%). The incidences of most adverse events were relatively low, while the incidences of 2 frequently reported adverse events, myalgia (18%) and anemia (25%), were even higher than with the first-generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib.

conclusionGenerally, alectinib is a drug with preferable efficacy and tolerable adverse effects, and it is suitable for the treatment of intracranial metastases.

Indexed as

alectinibALKALK inhibitoranaplastic lymphoma kinasemeta-analysisnon-small cell lung cancerNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID29535535
PMCPMC5840301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.