Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29535519›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Colon-targeted delivery of cyclosporine A using dual-functional Eudragit

Muhammad Naeem, Junhwan Bae, Murtada A Oshi, Min-Soo Kim, Hyung Ryong Moon, Bok Luel Lee, Eunok Im, Yunjin Jung, Jin-Wook Yoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CombinedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad Naeem *College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Junhwan Bae *College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Murtada A OshiCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Min-Soo KimCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Ryong MoonCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Bok Luel LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Eunok ImCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Yunjin JungCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Wook YooCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Pusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColon-targeted oral nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as an ideal, safe, and effective therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) owing to their ability to selectively accumulate in inflamed colonic mucosa. Cyclosporine A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, has long been used as rescue therapy in severe steroid-refractory UC. In this study, we developed CSA-loaded dual-functional polymeric NPs composed of Eudragit

methodsCSA-loaded Eudragit FS30D nanoparticles (ENPs), PLGA nanoparticles (PNPs), and Eudragit FS30D/PLGA nanoparticles (E/PNPs) were prepared using the oil-in-water emulsion method. Scanning electron microscope images and zeta size data showed successful preparation of CSA-loaded NPs.

resultsPNPs exhibited a burst drug release of >60% at pH 1.2 (stomach pH) in 0.5 h, which can lead to unwanted systemic absorption and side effects. ENPs effectively inhibited the burst drug release at pH 1.2 and 6.8 (proximal small intestine pH); however, nearly 100% of the CSA in ENPs was released rapidly at pH 7.4 (ileum-colon pH) owing to complete NP dissolution. In contrast to single-functional PNPs and ENPs, the dual-functional E/PNPs minimized burst drug release (only 18%) at pH 1.2 and 6.8, and generated a sustained release at pH 7.4 thereafter. Importantly, in distribution studies in the gastrointestinal tracts of mice, E/PNPs significantly improved CSA distribution to the colon compared with PNPs or ENPs. In a mouse model of colitis, E/PNP treatment improved weight loss and colon length, and decreased rectal bleeding, spleen weight, histological scoring, myeloperoxidase activity, macrophage infiltration, and expression of proinflammatory cytokines compared with PNPs or ENPs.

conclusionOverall, this work confirms the benefits of CSA-loaded E/PNPs for efficiently delivering CSA to the colon, suggesting their potential for UC therapy.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAdministration, OralAnimalsBody WeightColitisColonCyclosporineCytokinesDrug CarriersDrug LiberationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammation MediatorsLactic AcidMacrophagesMethylmethacrylatesCyclosporineCytokinesDrug CarriersImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammation MediatorsLactic AcidMethylmethacrylatesPeroxidasePolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymercolon-targeted nanoparticlescyclosporine Asustained and pH-sensitive releaseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID29535519
PMCPMC5836652
OpenAlexW2791979595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.