Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29535515›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2018

Home noninvasive ventilatory support for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patient selection and perspectives.

Jan Hendrik Storre, Jens Callegari, Friederike Sophie Magnet, Sarah Bettina Schwarz, Marieke Leontine Duiverman, Peter Jan Wijkstra, Wolfram Windisch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What is the impact of home non-invasive ventilation on the health-related quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Quality of Care for People with Home Mechanical Ventilation in Germany: A Scoping Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan Hendrik StorreDepartment of Intensive Care, Sleep Medicine and Mechanical Ventilation, Asklepios Fachkliniken Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany.
Jens CallegariDepartment of Pneumology, Cologne Merheim Hospital, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Friederike Sophie MagnetDepartment of Pneumology, Cologne Merheim Hospital, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Sarah Bettina SchwarzDepartment of Pneumology, Cologne Merheim Hospital, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Marieke Leontine DuivermanDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter Jan WijkstraDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wolfram WindischDepartment of Pneumology, Cologne Merheim Hospital, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
CBS International Business School · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term or home mechanical noninvasive ventilation (Home-NIV) has become a well-established form of therapy over the last few decades for chronic hypercapnic COPD patients in European countries. However, meta-analyses and clinical guidelines do not recommend Home-NIV for COPD patients on a routine basis. In particular, there is ongoing debate about Home-NIV in chronic hypercapnic COPD regarding the overall effects, the most favorable treatment strategy, the selection of eligible patients, and the time point at which it is prescribed. The current review focuses on specific aspects of patient selection and discusses the various scientific as well as clinical-guided perspectives on Home-NIV in patients suffering from chronic hypercapnic COPD. In addition, special attention will be given to the topic of ventilator settings and interfaces.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingHome Care ServicesPatient SelectionHumansHypercapniaLungNoninvasive VentilationPatient CompliancePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeexacerbationhypercapniamechanical ventilationpulmonary emphysemarespiratory insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID29535515
PMCPMC5836655
OpenAlexW2789937960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.