ArticlePediatrics2018
Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC).
Article in Pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03522233 (Clinical Outcomes and Charges After Risk Stratification by Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Outcomes and Charges After Risk Stratification by Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in Children With Appendix Ultrasounds at a Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Diagnostic Imaging for Pediatric Appendicitis: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Habitat Radiomics and Machine Learning for Preoperative Three-class Classification of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: A Dual-center Study with External Validation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Critical Methodological Review of Clinical Scores, Machine Learning, and Large Language Models for the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Appendicitis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Blood biomarkers and penalized logistic regression for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in children: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Complicated Appendicitis and Expected Hospital Length of Stay in Children: An Exploratory Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Transfer practices and outcomes for suspected appendicitis from community hospitals to a paediatric tertiary emergency department.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Reconsidering the use of race, sex, and age in clinical algorithms to address bias in practice: A discussion paper.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Review
- Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Development of a new predictive clinico-biological score for acute appendicitis in the pediatric population.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Validation and Comparison of Pediatric Appendicitis Scores and Management Strategies (Project SPASMS): Protocol for a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- MRI Adoption in Pediatric Appendicitis: Trends and Outcomes.Hospital pediatrics · 2025Article
- Exploring diagnostic stewardship in the emergency department evaluation of pediatric abdominal pain in a statewide quality collaborative.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive Factors of Acute Appendicitis and Its Outcomes Among the Pediatric Age Group.Cureus · 2025Article
- Can the Combination of White Blood Cell Count and C-Reactive Protein Rule Out Pediatric Appendicitis, a Retrospective Analysis?HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Utility of Ischemia-Modified Albumin as a Biomarker for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- [Appendicitis predictive score for children younger than 4 years]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2023Article
- Trends and Predictors of Pediatric Negative Appendectomy Rates: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinical Features and Preventability of Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis.JAMA network open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe sought to develop and validate a clinical calculator that can be used to quantify risk for appendicitis on a continuous scale for patients with acute abdominal pain.
methodsThe pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) was developed and validated through secondary analyses of 3 distinct cohorts. The derivation sample included visits to 9 pediatric emergency departments between March 2009 and April 2010. The validation sample included visits to a single pediatric emergency department from 2003 to 2004 and 2013 to 2015. Variables evaluated were as follows: age, sex, temperature, nausea and/or vomiting, pain duration, pain location, pain with walking, pain migration, guarding, white blood cell count, and absolute neutrophil count. We used stepwise regression to develop and select the best model. Test performance of the pARC was compared with the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS).
resultsThe derivation sample included 2423 children, 40% of whom had appendicitis. The validation sample included 1426 children, 35% of whom had appendicitis. The final pARC model included the following variables: sex, age, duration of pain, guarding, pain migration, maximal tenderness in the right-lower quadrant, and absolute neutrophil count. In the validation sample, the pARC exhibited near perfect calibration and a high degree of discrimination (area under the curve: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.83 to 0.87) and outperformed the PAS (area under the curve: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 0.80). By using the pARC, almost half of patients in the validation cohort could be accurately classified as at <15% risk or ≥85% risk for appendicitis, whereas only 23% would be identified as having a comparable PAS of <3 or >8.
conclusionsIn our validation cohort of patients with acute abdominal pain, the pARC accurately quantified risk for appendicitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.