Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29535150›Full record

ArticleGenetics2018

Evolutionary Rescue over a Fitness Landscape.

Yoann Anciaux, Luis-Miguel Chevin, Ophélie Ronce, Guillaume Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Excluded phenotypes" restrict genetic paths toward adaptation in declining populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Impacts of limits to adaptation on population and community persistence in a changing environment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary rescue on genotypic fitness landscapes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evolutionary Rescue of an EnvironmentalFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The probability of evolutionary rescue: towards a quantitative comparison between theory and evolution experiments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoann AnciauxInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), 34095 Montpellier, France yoann.anciaux@umontpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2845-4034
Luis-Miguel ChevinCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE, 34293 Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Ophélie RonceInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), 34095 Montpellier, France.
Guillaume MartinInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), 34095 Montpellier, France.

Funding

European Research Council 678140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary rescue describes a situation where adaptive evolution prevents the extinction of a population facing a stressing environment. Models of evolutionary rescue could in principle be used to predict the level of stress beyond which extinction becomes likely for species of conservation concern, or, conversely, the treatment levels most likely to limit the emergence of resistant pests or pathogens. Stress levels are known to affect both the rate of population decline (demographic effect) and the speed of adaptation (evolutionary effect), but the latter aspect has received less attention. Here, we address this issue using Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. In this model, the fitness effects of mutations depend both on the genotype and the environment in which they arise. In particular, the model introduces a dependence between the level of stress, the proportion of rescue mutants, and their costs before the onset of stress. We obtain analytic results under a strong-selection-weak-mutation regime, which we compare to simulations. We show that the effect of the environment on evolutionary rescue can be summarized into a single composite parameter quantifying the effective stress level, which is amenable to empirical measurement. We describe a narrow characteristic stress window over which the rescue probability drops from very likely to very unlikely as the level of stress increases. This drop is sharper than in previous models, as a result of the decreasing proportion of stress-resistant mutations as stress increases. We discuss how to test these predictions with rescue experiments across gradients of stress.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessModels, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationEnvironmentGene-Environment InteractionGene ExpressionMutationSelection, GeneticStress, Physiologicalantibiotic resistanceevolutionary rescueFisher’s geometric modelfitness landscapemutation

Identifiers

PMID29535150
PMCPMC5937192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.